eufy X10 Pro Omni vs roborock Q7 M5+: Two Weights for One Robot

Two all-in-one robots, a price band apart. The roborock claims more suction for less, the eufy states more runtime, and one of them is listed at 3.2 times its own weight depending on whom you ask.

The two listings at a glance

These are the two all-in-one robots in our catalogue that sit closest together: both vacuum and mop, both come with a dock that does the housekeeping, and both state a dust bag of about two and a half litres. They differ by a price band, by a claim about suction, and by a number that the listing and our own review cannot agree on at all. Unlike most pages on this site, many of the figures below come from only one source, because our review tables quote runtime and noise on very few of these robots. The table marks which is which.

One robot, two weights

Our review of the eufy quotes its weight as about 8.3 pounds, or 3.76 kilograms. Amazon’s specification field gives 26.4 pounds, or 12 kilograms. The two sources are not close: the difference is 8.2 kilograms, a factor of 3.2. A gap like that is not rounding or a different unit; it means two different things were weighed. The listing does not say what, and a self-washing station with water tanks, a dust bag and heating for the mop pads is a plausible candidate for the heavier figure, but that is inference, not something we can read. For the roborock the two sources agree at 4.8 kilograms, 10.6 pounds, which says nothing about whether that figure is the robot or the robot plus its dock either.

It matters for a practical reason. Weight tells you whether you can lift the robot up a flight of stairs, and whether the dock is something you will move. The robot class report finds the same split across the whole class: some robots are listed at around three kilograms and some at six to seventeen, and the high figures belong disproportionately to units with large stations. Until a listing says what its weight includes, treat any robot weight on any site, ours included, as unresolved.

Suction: 8,000 against 10,000, and who states it where

The roborock states 10,000 Pa in its title and again in a bullet. The eufy’s title states no suction figure; its bullets give 8,000 Pa, and our review quotes the same. That makes the cheaper robot’s claim 25 percent higher than the dearer one’s. It does not make it a stronger machine, because neither listing says how its figure was measured, and a pascal figure for a robot is not a standard unit of cleaning performance in the way a runtime is a unit of time.

The spread across the class is five to one, from the 4,000 Pa of an entry-level ILIFE to the 20,000 Pa that two listings claim. Two robots on this page sit in the middle of that range. If suction is the deciding factor for you, the number to look for is not the pascal figure but evidence of how it was measured, and neither listing offers it.

What the dock does, and what each states about it

The eufy’s station washes the mop pads with fresh water and dries them with 45-degree heated air, holds a 2.5-litre dust bag that its listing says needs replacing about every two months, and carries a 3-litre clean water tank. The roborock’s dock empties the robot into a sealed 2.7-litre bag, which its title says lasts up to seven to nine weeks. So the bags are about the same size and last about the same time, and the interesting difference is what else the dock does. The eufy’s bullet describes washing and drying the mop pads; the roborock’s, in the text we read, describes dust collection only.

What neither listing says

Runtime is on Amazon’s page for both, 173 minutes for the eufy and 150 for the roborock, and the class median is 120, so both are above typical. Neither listing says whether that runtime is on the lowest suction mode, and the stick vacuum report shows why that matters: several runtime claims in the neighbouring class are measured in the most favourable mode. Noise is also Amazon-only, 60 dB for the eufy and 65 for the roborock. The eufy’s listing gives a voltage of 220 volts; a US outlet supplies 120, and a robot that charges from its dock should not need more, so confirm it with the seller. Neither lists a HEPA filter, which three robots in the class do.

Which suits which

What this comparison cannot tell you

Nothing here was tested. We did not run either robot, so we cannot say which maps a home better, which handles a rug edge, or whether either one’s mop leaves a floor damp. A pascal figure is not suction you can feel, and a runtime is for conditions we do not know. For each robot in full, see our eufy X10 Pro Omni review and our roborock Q7 M5+ review.

Figures are the manufacturers’, as published on each listing and quoted in our reviews; none was measured by us. How we work · Affiliate disclosure